Potential impacts and risks identified along the supply chain
In the 2024 financial year, Swissgrid reviewed and updated the analysis of the potential direct and indirect impacts on people and the environment along its supply chain and the resulting risks for Swissgrid in its dual materiality analysis, the ERM process, and an analysis focussing on compliance with human rights. Although Swissgrid has identified various social and environmental risk areas along its supply chain, based on the due diligence checks carried out and the evaluation of the reports received by Swissgrid’s whistleblower system, there is no reasonable suspicion of a violation of human rights (including child labour) in connection with products or services procured by Swissgrid.
Potential negative impacts on the environment: as part of the dual materiality analysis (see the section on «Sustainability at Swissgrid»), the material flow analysis (see the section on the «Circular economy») and the survey of Scope 3 GHG emissions, Swissgrid has identified the most important product groups with regard to their environmental footprint along the entire life cycle. They include transformers, conductors, cables, switchgears, concrete and steel. In addition, Swissgrid has identified and evaluated potential negative externalities in relation to the upstream production process of the purchased products and services. The risk of inadequate environmental management systems of direct and indirect suppliers, which can lead to negative environmental externalities, was identified as material. Examples include the release of environmentally hazardous substances into the air, water or soil, high GHG emissions or energy consumption from non-renewable sources, the improper disposal of waste and the extraction of abiotic and biotic raw materials.
Potential negative impacts on people and society: as part of the ERM process, Swissgrid has classed the risk of personal accidents on installations as a very high business risk. This applies to employees of Swissgrid and of external service providers (see the «Occupational health and safety» section).
In the 2024 financial year, Swissgrid also updated its risk analysis with regard to compliance with human rights along its supply chain. This was based on the country risks of the production sites for Swissgrid’s most important grid components and the major export countries for critical raw materials used in these components, including copper, aluminium, steel, zinc, nickel and cobalt. The risk analysis focused on child labour, forced labour, freedom of association, occupational health and safety, discrimination, remuneration and working hours, and was carried out using qualitative expert assessment and quantitative data.
The result shows that the potential risks in relation to Swissgrid’s direct suppliers are low for the majority of grid components, with the exception of one production site in Latin America for one of the subcomponents. As part of the country risk analysis, potential risks in relation to working conditions (remuneration and working hours) were rated highest. Other sector-agnostic country risks were found relating to child labour, forced labour, freedom of association and occupational safety. The UNICEF Children’s Rights Index recommends increased due diligence for the country concerned in order to analyse and mitigate the risks in greater depth. The potential risks are at least partially mitigated by the fact that the results of an external assessment showed that the supplier in question has advanced sustainability systems in place in various areas, including labour and human rights. Swissgrid is also planning to conduct a detailed risk analysis of its supply chain for the 2025 financial year in order to define further risk-based measures.
Overall, the environmental and social risks in relation to Swissgrid’s direct suppliers were deemed to be lower than the potential risks from upstream, indirect suppliers. This is primarily due to the prevalence of suppliers from Switzerland and neighbouring EU countries with a high level of protection, strict regulatory framework and correspondingly lower country risks.